20
(1979),
296}.
I,
L'Y
slyfistics
is
!he
CO!lllihmes with
critic
w
ail
ro
"'"'
a
aJid appreciarimr of
literat:ure,
srudies
sl2o 1n
I!W
a
imowiooge
Jil'!Kmabgy, mOlJ711IDiogy, 'lioc.llbul<i!!li'y, synm,
d!emdcai
graphological deW:es can
m
Elllllce overt
what the
smsilive
ofli
l:w;
been
covertly awof.(p.lll).
langooge.
Lil'etrtiiJ'
stylistlcs is thus not
We
may...
sl;yllircics a!£ a
em
of B:.!'ld
giv© it
a special
sub!JOO!ion &:allmg
Fecru:of ll!=ry texis.
We
may m
lililllllre
!llyli> ::ics
"
Sll c
litemry "-hlch may oo
occasion
din:w on
llilgulstic
m
:!!lc!cts.
CN -
may
reg>IDl !IS :m a££l:IY'
ollS
disciplioo
,; freely,
and
""lectieally, on oofu
linguistics
and
lrternzy
:/!"""""'. .nus.ed sgl e!.!ibsU'LlllOl.b!!ml).
meruing
in
is
being
 |