22
prepared
and
copied
throughout
the
district
offices
and
SUs,
as
seen
from
table
2.3.
Table 2.3 Corporate
business
objectives
of 2007/2008
to 2009/2010
(Kantor
Pusat, 2008, p. 7).
The Overall Outcome
Students in average gain distinctive
learning achievement
and personality
excellence
Objectives
Performance
Measures
Targets
2008–2009
2009–2010
1.
Students gain
Rank of National
In average, each
In average, each
both academic
Examination
results
school attains the
school attains the
and non-
academic
excellence
2.
Self-
responsibility
and cordiality
grows
(personality
excellence).
compared to 5 to 10
main competitors
of
each school
Achievements
in
extracurricular
competitions
National diagnostic
test
result (administered
by
Tarakanita)
•
Students’ self-
responsibility
in
average
•
Students’ cordiality
in
average
•
Employees’ self-
responsibility
in
average
•
Employees’ self-
responsibility
in
average
third rank.
In average, every
school gains 4
times winning
competitions
In average, each
school gains 6,5
80%
80%
80%
80%
third rank.
In average, each
school wins the
second position
twice
In average, each
school gains 7,5
90%
90%
90%
90%
The
above
outcome
matrix
was
then
followed
by
an
elaboration
of
the
four
perspectives
into
a
more
detailed
matrix
as
shown
in
Table
2.4.
This
matrix
was
provided with
the
strategic initiatives.
What
departments,
district
offices,
and
schools
do was
simply
analyzing
each
strategic
initiatives
into their
operational
programs, taking other things for granted.
 |